Which licence questions should environment builders resolve before adoption?

**What use should we describe when requesting a licence?**

Describe whether generated material will support internal training, internal evaluation, a hosted environment or a distributed environment package. Also explain whether users or agents can retrieve complete records through tools. Runtime exposure can differ materially from keeping assets inside an internal test harness.

**Which permissions should we ask about explicitly?**

Ask about adapting schemas, creating derived scenarios, sharing assets with contractors and redistributing records or environment bundles. If a public MCP interface will return generated content, include that access pattern in the discussion. Publication of editorial content does not itself establish rights to redistribute a separate dataset or task pack.

**What about evaluation outputs?**

Clarify whether reports, action traces and example records can be published, especially when those outputs reproduce supplied material. Describe the intended audience and degree of detail so the proposed use is concrete.

MirrorFirm can be asked to confirm applicable permissions and restrictions for the requested scope. Do not assume particular terms from a sample, and avoid designing distribution around permissions that have not been agreed.