Skip to content
MirrorFirm

What integration contract should a pilot establish before agents consume a release?

A pilot integration contract can pin schemas, tool semantics and release versions so changing content does not silently invalidate engineering comparisons.

Agree a release manifest before connecting the material to an agent pipeline. It can identify release_id, schema_version, policy_bundle_version, environment_version and evaluation_spec_version. These identifiers serve different purposes: a content revision need not imply a schema change, while a scoring change can invalidate comparisons even when the records stay the same.

For file delivery, request a file inventory, checksums and declared encodings. For MCP consumption, agree resource identifiers, pagination behaviour and whether a response represents a pinned release or the latest content. Record the resolved release in each run so later analysis can recover what the agent actually consumed.

Tool contracts should define required arguments, error meanings and whether an action mutates state. A pilot adapter can validate responses against the agreed schema before forwarding them to the agent.

Ask how corrections and incompatible changes will be communicated, without assuming a particular service level. A practical first integration is a read-only load that checks references and required fields, followed by a bounded action test against a pinned environment. This establishes compatibility before results influence a deployment decision.

Make release changes detectable before they alter agent inputs, tool behaviour or the meaning of evaluation results.

Audience:
Agent developers
Content type:
Integration
Buyer question:
Scope and getting started

Content release: r-a220eb6e099b243b

More on Policy change propagation