What should we inspect before using generated review material?

Inspect the generated output and its supporting documentation before admitting a review pack into a training or evaluation collection.

- Ask how business observations informed workflow structure, distinguishing those design inputs from the generated records being supplied. - Check that roles, handovers and exceptions form a coherent process that a domain reviewer can explain without inventing missing steps. - Verify that generated policies agree with task expectations and do not require mutually incompatible decisions from the same evidence. - Inspect for unexpected identifiers, distinctive wording or unusual combinations that warrant further review of possible source resemblance. - Confirm that any claims about realism describe the represented process and do not imply delivery of underlying business records. - Record unresolved grounding and disclosure questions, with an explicit decision about whether each prevents the proposed use.

Synthetic output does not automatically establish anonymity, privacy compliance or regulatory approval. A buyer can ask MirrorFirm for information sufficient to inspect grounding and disclosure risk within the proposed scope. These checks address the suitability of the material itself; they should remain visible even when the agent performs well on the tasks.