What should a reseller confirm before describing this workflow to customers?
This checklist lists the facts a reseller should verify in a sample before writing a listing, so the description matches what the data actually contains.
Before you write a listing or a datasheet, confirm each of these in a sample, not in a brief.
- The case types covered, such as lending, claims or service connections, are named in the manifest. - Each case links to a policy record, and the policy version is stated. - Outcomes distinguish accepted, rejected, missing and unusable documents. - Requests for missing items exist as records, with wording, due point and consequence. - Resubmissions are present, so multi-turn behaviour can be tested. - Exception paths, such as waivers and escalations, appear and are labelled. - The documents are generated text or structured content, and the manifest says whether images or scans are included. - A disclosure and grounding note is supplied, and you have read it.
Treat any item you cannot confirm as out of scope for the listing. It is better to describe a narrower product accurately than a broader one loosely.
Remember that the content is generated, and that generated material still needs inspection for similarity to real records and for anything that looks like a leak of source detail. Do not describe it to your customers as anonymised or compliant by default.
Verify these points in a sample first, and your listing will describe the product accurately instead of promising more than it holds.
- Audience:
- Licensed resellers
- Content type:
- Checklist
- Buyer question:
- What it is and why it matters
Content release: r-a220eb6e099b243b
Related questions
- What does it mean for an agent to decide whether the supplied documents are enough?
- What does a sufficiency decision look like on a real loan application?
- How do I tell whether my process suits sufficiency-focused training or evaluation?
- Where does the sufficiency decision sit in an agent loop, and which tool actions does it need?
- Why not handle this with a fixed checklist or rules engine instead of an agent?
- How does a sufficiency decision map onto environment state and tool actions?