How do I tell whether my process suits sufficiency-focused training or evaluation?

Use this list to judge whether a process in your product suits training and evaluation focused on document sufficiency.

- **Gated next step:** a commitment such as approval, booking or dispatch waits on a set of documents. - **Variable requirements:** the required items differ by case type, customer circumstance or jurisdiction. - **Policy versions:** the requirement list changes over time and old cases follow the old list. - **Staggered arrival:** documents come over several messages, not in a single bundle. - **Hand-written requests:** a person currently writes the follow-up message naming what is missing. - **Costly false proceed:** acting on thin evidence causes rework, reversals or unsound decisions. - **Costly false wait:** unnecessary requests cause delay, repeat contact or lost customers. - **Conflicting evidence:** documents can disagree with each other, not just be absent.

If most items apply, the sufficiency step is a distinct skill. It is worth measuring separately, with labelled gaps and scored requests, so a failure can be traced to the check rather than to a later stage.