What makes a sufficiency decision worth putting in a simulated environment?

Use this list to judge whether a candidate workflow gives an environment team something real to build and score.

- The decision has more than two outcomes, such as proceed, request missing items, or escalate to a specialist reviewer. - Requirements change with case attributes like product, amount band, customer type or jurisdiction, so one fixed checklist cannot answer every case. - Some gaps can be closed from records the business already holds, which tests whether the agent looks before it asks. - Documents can be present yet unusable because they are stale, unsigned, incomplete, duplicated or issued to the wrong party. - The chosen action changes state: case status, a waiting clock, a queue position or a request log entry. - Replies arrive later and can be partial, so a single case needs a second or third decision. - Different wrong outcomes carry different costs, which lets a scorer separate premature release from over-requesting. - The end state can be written down in advance and checked by a script rather than judged by a person.