Skip to content
MirrorFirm

Can generated data include expired, revoked or conflicting delegations?

Answers whether a generated release can include expired grants, revocations, overlaps and conflicts of interest, and how these would be labelled for evaluation.

**Yes.** A buyer can ask for these conditions to be included and labelled, and a pilot is the place to agree how many and in what mix.

**Conditions a release could include**

- **Expired delegations.** A grant whose end date passed before the decision date. - **Revoked delegations.** A grant withdrawn by the grantor, with the revocation event recorded. - **Overlapping grants.** Two delegations covering the same person with different limits, so the agent must pick the correct one. - **Self-approval.** The requester also holds authority for the item, which policy forbids. - **Related-party conflicts.** A reviewer is linked to the supplier or customer on the request. - **Scope mismatches.** A valid grant that excludes the category, risk rating or amount of the item.

**How they would be labelled**

Each task can carry a condition tag, such as `expired-grant` or `self-approval`, along with the permitted outcomes. That lets an evaluation team report results per condition and see which failure types a model is prone to.

**Limits**

The data is generated, so the patterns reflect the design brief and the underlying observation of how businesses operate, not a copy of any real organisation's records. Inspect the sample for realism, coverage and disclosure risk before using it to draw conclusions.

Expired, revoked and conflicting authority are the cases where agents most often act wrongly, so a buyer can ask for them as labelled test conditions.

Audience:
Evaluation teams
Content type:
FAQ
Buyer question:
What can be generated

Content release: r-a220eb6e099b243b

More on Delegated approval