Can the generated authority matrix follow the structure of our own approval process?

A buyer can ask for the generated matrix to follow a described structure. You supply the shape, not your records.

Useful inputs include:

- the number of approval tiers and how bands are defined, for example by amount, risk score or product line - role titles or role families, so output uses terms your agent will meet - whether delegation is allowed, how long it can last and whether it can be passed on - conflict rules, such as requester exclusion or dual approval above a threshold - the downstream systems an approval changes, so environment state mirrors them

A release can then vary what you did not specify: amounts, timings, absence patterns, ambiguous wording and exception cases. That variation is what stops an agent memorising one matrix.

There are limits. The output is generated, and matching a structure does not mean it reproduces how your organisation actually behaves. Treat the match as a starting hypothesis and test it against what your own approvers would say is correct.

Also inspect the sample for grounding and disclosure risk. Ask where the structure came from, whether any phrase or figure looks like it came from material you hold, and whether the exceptions are plausible. If the structure you describe is unusual, a pilot is a sensible place to find out how far the generation can follow it.