What licence questions should a lab settle before using a generated pack?

**Does receiving a sample establish permission for every downstream use?**

A buyer should establish the permitted use explicitly. Inspection, model training, internal evaluation and redistribution are different activities. Public accessibility through a website, export or MCP interface should not be treated as a substitute for agreed usage rights.

**Which downstream uses deserve attention?**

State whether the lab intends to include generated tasks in shared benchmarks, publish sample records in research, retain evaluation traces or provide access to contractors. Ask how the proposed licence treats transformed datasets, annotations, model weights and outputs derived from use of the material. These are questions for the agreement, not assumed permissions.

**What should accompany the request?**

Provide a concise usage map covering who receives the material, where it is processed and which artefacts may leave the lab. Identify any customer-facing product use separately from internal research.

MirrorFirm could scope generated material against that intended use, with licence details settled through the commercial process. This avoids inventing standard terms or assuming rights from a delivery format. A useful first step is to review the usage map with the lab's procurement and legal roles before committing the material to a pipeline.