How should a team scope the adapter between generated tasks and its own agent tools?

Begin with a mapping between the task's business actions and the interfaces your agent already uses. A generated action named `update_billing_contact` might map to several sandbox calls if your platform stores contacts and billing preferences separately. The adapter should preserve the action's meaning rather than merely rename fields.

Specify identifier translation, enum mappings, required arguments and error conversion. Keep an explicit table of unsupported operations. If the sandbox cannot represent a pending review, that limitation should be visible instead of silently mapping it to a completed state.

Ask for a contract fixture containing a request, the intended adapter calls and the resulting sandbox state. Running that fixture without an agent helps establish whether the integration can express the expected outcome at all.

The pilot can then distinguish adapter conformance from agent decision quality. Agree which team owns mapping changes and how schema revisions are detected before execution. This creates a concrete starting point: a validated path from one generated business action to observable sandbox behaviour, with unresolved interface gaps documented.