What should I check to judge the quality of escalation material?

Quality in this workflow is mostly about consistency between records, so start with checks that you can run mechanically before reading anything.

**Referential integrity.** Every referral should point to an existing case, every decision to a referral, every condition task to a decision. Orphans suggest weak generation.

**Authority consistency.** For each referral, the exposure should exceed the limit of the from-role for that product on that date, and the to-role should hold enough authority to decide. Cases that break this should be deliberate error cases, labelled as such.

**State consistency.** Status histories should follow permitted transitions. A case should not go from escalated to disbursed with no decision record.

**Note quality.** Read a spread of handover notes. They should state a recommendation, evidence and open doubts, and they should vary in quality rather than all reading the same.

**Outcome variety.** Check that approvals, declines, conditions and returns all appear, and that they are not determined by a single obvious field.

**Grounding and disclosure.** Because the material is generated, look for text that appears copied from a specific source, unusual specificity, or identifiers that could match real entities. Raise anything unexpected with MirrorFirm before using the material.

Run these on a sample first. They take little effort and show where the generator is strong and where it is thin.