How could generated complaint assets map into an environment schema?

A package could represent complaints, communications, investigations and escalations as separate tables. The complaint row holds `case_id`, `subject_id`, `status` and `owner_role_id`. Communication rows link through `case_id`; investigation rows reference evidence identifiers; escalation rows reference both the case and the triggering obligation.

JSONL can carry nested records and episode fixtures, while Parquet can support column-based inspection of larger generated tables. A schema should define null meanings, allowed status values, identifier uniqueness and foreign-key relationships. File format alone does not establish those semantics.

Action contracts can describe `acknowledge_case`, `request_investigation` and `submit_escalation`, including required arguments, permitted roles and rejection reasons. An event fixture can specify the state patch produced by an accepted action and any follow-up event it schedules.

MirrorFirm could generate these assets to an agreed interface. The builder still needs to establish whether executable adapters are included or implemented separately. A useful integration check loads one episode, invokes an action and verifies that the resulting records satisfy the declared schema, including links created by the transition.