How can generated complaint records be packaged for agent development?

A release can use JSONL for message streams and task definitions, with Parquet tables for cases, evidence items, assignments and decisions. The format choice should follow the buyer's ingestion path; the essential requirement is a shared schema and stable identifiers across files.

A case table could include case_id, subject_account_id, intake_channel and opened_at. Message records can carry message_id, case_id, author_role and sent_at. An evidence_links table can connect a finding_id to an evidence_id with a relationship such as supports, contradicts or requires_review.

Specify identifier namespaces and null semantics. An unknown account is different from a complaint that does not concern an account. Likewise, a missing decision record should not be confused with a decision whose outcome remains pending. Schema documentation can make these distinctions explicit.

A manifest can declare schema_version, file roles and referential integrity rules. Executable fixtures can reference the same case identifiers when loading an environment. A buyer can then trace an agent observation back to its generated source record and verify that ingestion has preserved ordering, links and meaning across formats.