What licence questions should a lab resolve before using a release?

**Does access to a sample establish rights to train on it?**

Do not infer that from access alone. Ask which uses the applicable licence permits, including training, fine-tuning, internal evaluation and retention of derived artefacts. MirrorFirm's generated output remains a commercial product whose permitted uses need to be understood.

**What if several teams or external collaborators need access?**

Describe the intended access pattern and ask how it is covered. Internal availability, contractor access and redistribution to another organisation are different questions. Avoid assuming that downloading a file resolves all of them.

**Can a lab publish benchmark examples or evaluation results?**

Ask separately about publishing aggregate results, quoting records and distributing task or environment files. Public access through an MCP endpoint should not be treated as evidence of unrestricted reuse rights.

**What should we provide before licence review?**

A concise use description can identify the intended model activities, access groups, publication plans and retention needs. These are questions to resolve in the applicable agreement, not statements of existing MirrorFirm terms or a substitute for reviewing them.