Skip to content
MirrorFirm

Is predicting the right queue enough to evaluate a routing agent?

A correct queue prediction does not establish that an agent can perform an authorised handover, communicate its decision or handle a rejected assignment.

**Is predicting the right queue enough?**

No. Prediction identifies a proposed destination. A working agent must also establish whether it may assign the request, perform the permitted action and recognise whether the destination accepted it. These are separate capabilities.

**What can go wrong after a correct prediction?**

A professional services enquiry may belong to a restricted engagement queue. An intake agent can identify that queue but lack permission to assign work directly. The authorised next step may be a referral to an intake reviewer. Attempting a direct assignment is still a failure, even when the destination is correct.

**How should a task represent that distinction?**

A generated task could specify the agent's role, available tools and permitted transitions. Its expected outcome could distinguish a recommendation, a submitted referral and an accepted assignment. The agent's final response should accurately describe which state it reached.

**Why does this matter for training?**

If every correct label is rewarded as completed work, the agent learns to report success before the business process has changed. Evaluation should examine both the proposed destination and the action the agent was actually authorised to complete.

Separate decision quality from execution quality so a successful prediction cannot conceal an incomplete or unauthorised action.

Audience:
Agent developers
Content type:
FAQ
Buyer question:
What it is and why it matters

Content release: r-a220eb6e099b243b

More on Service routing