How should a buyer inspect grounding without receiving real business records?

**What should a buyer ask to inspect?**

Ask for a description of the operational patterns the generated material is intended to represent, the assumptions added during generation and the checks used to review the resulting package. For this workflow, useful patterns include delayed adoption, approval boundaries and exceptions that remain active after a rule changes.

**Does grounding require access to real business records?**

No. The commercial output is generated material. A buyer can ask how workflows, decisions and handovers informed the design without asking for the underlying business records. Any account of grounding should make clear what it supports and what it does not establish.

**What separate quality checks matter?**

Review whether the generated process is coherent, whether unusual combinations appear unjustifiably specific and whether text or identifiers create disclosure concerns. These checks address different questions. Operational plausibility does not establish low disclosure risk, and removing direct identifiers does not establish compliance.

**What should remain an explicit limitation?**

Generated status does not guarantee anonymity, privacy compliance or regulatory approval. A buyer should inspect grounding and disclosure risk in the context of its intended training, evaluation and distribution uses.