Which relationships could a generated release contain beyond policy versions?

A release can include a dependency network showing how a central rule becomes operational practice. Policy clauses can link to assessment checklists, approval templates, role instructions and decision records. Those artefacts can then link to the work items that used them.

In insurance administration, a revised evidence requirement might affect a claims checklist and a request letter while leaving the payment authorisation procedure unchanged. Generated relationships could distinguish `implements_clause`, `derived_from_template`, `used_in_decision` and `supersedes`. These links help a customer reason about the affected surface without assuming that every nearby document needs revision.

MirrorFirm could generate both the artefacts and their relationships, with selected dependencies omitted from the learner's view when discovery is part of the task. A complete reference graph could remain in a separate evaluation package.

For licensed resellers, the graph itself is part of the product definition. Removing templates or flattening relationships during repackaging can eliminate the evidence needed to solve the task. A useful catalogue description should therefore explain which dependency layers the licensed package contains and whether customers receive the reference graph, an operational view or both.