How can we inspect realism and keep evaluation answers out of agent observations?

**What should we inspect when judging whether generated material reflects business operations?**

Ask for an explanation of how operational grounding informed the generated workflow. Inspect whether roles have plausible responsibilities, required evidence can be obtained and consequences follow from the stated rules. A convincing writing style alone does not establish a coherent environment.

**Does generated output remove the need for disclosure review?**

No. The commercial output is generated material, and grounding and disclosure risk should still be inspected. Review unusual details, combinations of attributes and any supporting material supplied with the release. Synthetic status is not a guarantee of anonymity or compliance.

**How do we avoid giving away the answers?**

Keep evaluator labels, expected actions and explanation keys outside the agent-facing records. Check filenames, status labels and free-text notes as well as obvious answer columns. A case marked with an internal label meaning that reassessment is required can undermine the intended reasoning test.

MirrorFirm could provide separate observation and evaluation views for buyer inspection. Builders should verify that removing private annotations leaves enough legitimate evidence to solve the task.