Why would our customers need review sequences instead of account snapshots?

**What does a review sequence contain that a snapshot misses?**

A snapshot shows an account at one point. A sequence can show why it reached that state, which commitments were made and whether those commitments were fulfilled. The same current balance can support different decisions when one account has an unresolved condition from its previous review.

**Does every customer need a long history?**

No. A customer training a document classifier may only need individual records. A customer evaluating obligation tracking needs enough history to connect a previous condition, its due event and subsequent evidence. The useful length follows the task, rather than the desire to accumulate more rows.

**What should our catalogue distinguish?**

Distinguish current-state classification from continuity tasks. A generated continuity task could require a model to carry forward an unresolved undertaking without copying an outdated conclusion. It should also show when a commitment was explicitly waived or replaced.

**Why does that distinction matter commercially?**

It helps resellers describe what customers can actually learn or measure. A review sequence should earn its place through a decision that depends on history, rather than being marketed simply as a larger dataset.