What licensing scope should a reseller clarify before commissioning review material?

Begin with the intended distribution path. A reseller supplying downloadable generated datasets has different packaging needs from a marketplace exposing tasks through an API or hosting a simulated environment. Describe each planned channel before settling the release scope.

Ask which onward uses the proposed licence would permit: customer training, internal evaluation, hosted access, redistribution inside customer products or creation of derivative datasets. These are questions to resolve in the agreement, not permissions to infer from the material being synthetic.

Also distinguish the rights needed for the records from those needed for policy text, environment code, scoring logic and documentation. A bundle may contain several kinds of asset, and the reseller should understand which can be modified, rebranded or supplied separately.

A useful first step is a written distribution map showing the reseller, customer categories, delivery channels and intended uses. MirrorFirm could use that map to scope a generated review product and the associated licensing discussion. Avoid publishing a broad customer entitlement until it is supported by the agreed licence; a technically downloadable file does not by itself establish a right to pass it onward.