Can generated review packs include more than one acceptable answer?

**Can a review task have more than one acceptable answer?**

Yes. A generated policy can permit a reviewer to request further evidence or refer an uncertain matter to a specialist. Both responses may be defensible if they preserve the review's unresolved status and explain the uncertainty.

**What would the answer material contain?**

A task pack could include an acceptable-action set, required supporting facts and prohibited transitions. It could also describe what makes an alternative acceptable. Referral without identifying the unresolved issue might fail even when referral itself is allowed.

**How is this different from leaving the answer vague?**

The boundaries remain explicit. A review may permit several routes forward while forbidding closure until a mandatory requirement is met. The evaluator can check those boundaries and the evidence used to justify the chosen route.

**What should buyers request?**

Ask MirrorFirm to distinguish policy discretion from missing task information. Generated ambiguity should be intentional and documented in evaluator material. This allows evaluation teams to measure sound judgement without penalising an agent merely for selecting a different valid route.