Which record types should a buyer name when requesting an allocation dataset?
A request checklist covering receipts, obligations, relationships, adjustments, policies, case notes, outcomes and downstream state, so the generated set includes the links an evaluation depends on.
When writing a request, name the record types you need so the generated set contains the links your evaluation relies on.
- Receipts with exact, abbreviated, mistyped and missing payer references, so matching difficulty can be graded by type. - Open obligations with balances, due dates, status and terms such as discounts or instalment schedules. - Customer and payer relationships, including third-party payers and parent-subsidiary arrangements. - Credit notes, adjustments and disputes that change what is actually owed at the moment of matching. - Written policy rules with identifiers, tolerances, approval limits and suspense instructions, kept as versioned files. - Case notes, queries and replies with timestamps and role labels, covering handovers between teams. - Final allocations with reason codes, plus reversals that link back to the original allocation. - Downstream state such as ageing buckets, reminder schedules and account holds, so consequences can be checked.
Naming record types up front means the generated set contains the links your grader needs instead of leaving gaps to find later.
- Audience:
- Model labs
- Content type:
- Checklist
- Buyer question:
- What can be generated
Content release: r-a220eb6e099b243b
Related questions
- Can a release encode an organisation's allocation policies as well as transactions?
- What would a generated task for an insurance short-pay look like?
- What do the record schema and links look like in JSONL?
- What can a generated dataset for matching payments to obligations contain?
- Which record types should I request for a simulated payment matching environment?
- Can a release include tolerances, write-off limits and approval rules?