Skip to content
MirrorFirm

Can a generated environment include attachments that agents must inspect?

Generated attachments can carry evidence needed for a decision, provided their contents, metadata and effects agree with the surrounding environment records.

**Can the environment contain more than structured records and messages?**

Yes. A buyer can ask for generated attachments such as approval forms, remittance notices or service completion sheets. These can require the agent to inspect evidence before deciding whether an overdue obligation has been satisfied.

**What should an attachment contribute?**

Its content should answer a business question that cannot be settled from the filename alone. In healthcare administration, a returned authorisation form might omit a required approval field. The attachment exists and is readable, but its presence does not establish that the administrative requirement is complete.

**How should builders specify these artefacts?**

Define the supported media, extraction interface and acceptance rules. Distinguish source content from extracted text so an extraction failure does not silently become an absence of evidence. The environment can record which artefact was inspected and which validation rule accepted or rejected it.

All supplied artefacts should be generated. Buyers should inspect their grounding and disclosure risk as well as their consistency with linked records. Synthetic production alone does not establish that an attachment is appropriate for every intended use.

Specify evidence-bearing artefacts whose inspection changes what the agent can reasonably conclude.

Audience:
Environment builders
Content type:
FAQ
Buyer question:
What can be generated

Content release: r-a220eb6e099b243b

More on Overdue follow up