Skip to content
MirrorFirm

How should an evaluation team scope a pilot for booking datasets and tasks?

Scope a pilot around the questions you need answered: which products, which exception families, what output format and how results will be judged, then expand only after review.

Start from what you need to learn, not from volume. Three or four evaluation questions are enough, such as: can the agent read open conditions, does it hold files that should not be booked, and does it reconcile schedules for non-standard products?

Then scope the pilot around them.

**Product coverage.** Pick one or two products, for example term loans and asset finance, rather than every product at once.

**Exception families.** Choose the failure patterns that matter to you, such as open conditions, missing approver references and settlement mismatches.

**Output shape.** Decide on formats (JSONL or Parquet), whether you want a static dataset, a task pack with expected snapshots, or a simulated environment with tool actions.

**Grading approach.** State how you will judge results, including whether process rules and reason matching apply.

**Limits.** Be clear about intended use, such as evaluation only or also training, and about holdout handling. Licence terms, quantities and timelines are agreed in the scoping conversation, not assumed.

Finally, plan a review step. Inspect the sample for consistency, label quality and grounding, then decide what to widen. Treat the pilot as a way to test fit, not as a final specification.

A pilot defined by your evaluation questions keeps the first release small, gradeable and useful for deciding what to scale.

Audience:
Evaluation teams
Content type:
Explanation
Buyer question:
Scope and getting started

Content release: r-a220eb6e099b243b

More on Loan booking