Skip to content
MirrorFirm

How can a buyer inspect the quality of generated booking material?

Quality can be inspected through arithmetic and date consistency, policy-to-record agreement, review by domain staff, disclosure-risk checks and baseline agent runs against the answer keys.

Inspect a sample in layers, starting with what can be checked mechanically.

**Internal consistency:** schedules should reconcile with the facility amount, term and stated basis; dates should follow a believable order; every foreign key should resolve. Scripts can test these across the whole sample.

**Policy agreement:** pick cases and confirm that the records obey the policy documents, or break them in the way the answer key says they do. Any unexplained mismatch is a defect.

**Plausibility:** ask a credit operations or servicing practitioner to read several cases. They will notice unrealistic condition wording, odd handover notes or products that no lender would structure that way.

**Answer-key quality:** check that each key states a single expected end state or lists acceptable alternatives, and that a reasonable human operator would agree with it.

**Disclosure risk:** the material is generated, but a buyer should still look for text or combinations of details that resemble a real organisation or person, and raise anything suspicious with MirrorFirm.

**Baseline runs:** run a simple scripted agent and your own agent on a few tasks. If everything passes or nothing does, the difficulty or the key probably needs adjusting.

Record what you find. It becomes the brief for the next iteration.

A short, structured inspection of a sample tells you whether the material is coherent, plausible and safe to use for your purpose.

Audience:
Agent developers
Content type:
Explanation
Buyer question:
How to evaluate it

Content release: r-a220eb6e099b243b

More on Loan booking