What connected material can a generated correction case contain?

MirrorFirm could generate a case graph in which each record has a defined role. A source transaction describes the initial posting. Supporting evidence explains the claimed defect. A correction request proposes a change, while a decision record states whether that proposal is authorised.

The graph can then connect adjustment lines to reconciliation items and the case that coordinates the work. These relationships allow a model to move from an unexplained difference to the records that account for it, rather than receiving the answer in a single narrative.

Cardinality matters. One request can address several source lines, and one source line can receive separate corrections for different defects. A release can describe whether those relationships are permitted and how remaining unresolved amounts are represented.

Buyers can ask for both complete and deliberately incomplete graphs, with missing links identified in evaluator material. The output would be generated material. Inspection should cover the plausibility of the relationships, the basis for grounding and disclosure risk, alongside whether each case can actually be navigated using the supplied identifiers.