What licence questions should a model lab resolve before using a release?

**Does access to a sample establish permission to train on it?**

A buyer should ask which uses the applicable licence permits. Sample inspection, internal evaluation, model training and distribution are distinct activities; do not infer one permission from another.

**Which derived artefacts should the discussion cover?**

Describe the planned outputs, including trained weights, adapted task packs, evaluation reports and retained training examples. Ask how the proposed licence addresses each relevant artefact rather than relying on an undefined reference to research use.

**What about collaboration across a lab?**

Identify whether contractors, affiliated entities or external research collaborators need access. Also explain whether material will enter shared storage, annotation services or hosted training infrastructure. These facts help define the permissions the buyer needs to request.

**Does the delivery channel change the question?**

A website download or public MCP response should not be treated as a complete statement of permitted downstream use. Ask how release identifiers and licence information accompany each channel.

The useful first step is a short description of intended use and sharing, followed by review of the terms actually offered.