What licence questions matter when generated assets become part of an environment?

**What licence questions matter when generated assets become part of an environment?**

Ask which intended uses the proposed licence covers: internal training, internal evaluation, a hosted environment accessed by others, and redistribution of packaged assets. These are questions for scoping; they should not be assumed to share the same permissions.

**What about material created during use?**

Clarify treatment of modified records, expanded scenarios, agent trajectories, screenshots and exported evaluation reports. A trajectory can reproduce substantial task content even when the underlying dataset is not distributed separately. Builders should describe their planned outputs concretely.

**Does public access settle those questions?**

Do not infer reuse rights solely from visibility on a website, in a download or through a public MCP server. Ask which licence applies to the specific material and delivery channel.

MirrorFirm's commercial output is generated material, so the proposed scope should describe rights in those generated assets rather than access to business records used as grounding. Document the agreed boundaries before making the assets a dependency of a shared environment.