What should buyers inspect before trusting a generated correction pack?

Inspect the generated material and its supporting documentation before treating it as a reliable representation of correction work.

- Ask how direct observation of business operations informs the generated workflow structure and exception choices. - Review whether handovers, evidence requirements and role boundaries form a coherent process across the sample. - Check that narrative messages agree with structured records wherever disagreement is not an intentional task feature. - Inspect free text and unusual combinations of attributes for possible disclosure of sensitive source context. - Ask which grounding details were transformed, generalised or excluded when constructing the generated material. - Confirm that sample records, evaluator notes and exported attachments are all within the stated generated output scope.

MirrorFirm's commercial output is generated material, never real business records. That distinction does not itself establish anonymity, privacy compliance or regulatory approval. Grounding and disclosure risk still need inspection, including where a recognisable business incident could be conveyed without direct identifiers.

For agent developers, credibility and disclosure are separate acceptance questions. A pack can be internally consistent yet poorly grounded in how work proceeds, or operationally convincing while needing further disclosure review. Record those findings separately so that improvements to one dimension do not obscure unresolved issues in the other.