What licensing scope should a reseller clarify before offering generated referral products?

Start with the product the reseller intends to sell. A downloadable dataset, hosted evaluation service and accessible simulated environment can involve different uses of the same generated material. The licensing discussion should describe those uses explicitly rather than assume that permission to receive files includes every onward distribution model.

Identify the components involved: records, policy text, task prompts, answer keys, scoring rubrics, schemas and environment assets. Ask which can be redistributed, transformed, combined with other material or exposed through an API. If downstream customers will train models, clarify whether that intended use and any relevant derived artefacts fall within the agreed scope.

Also ask how provenance statements, limitations and component identifiers should accompany repackaged products. A reseller may rename a bundle or convert its format, but customers still need to understand what they are receiving and what the evaluation supports.

These are questions to resolve in scoping, not assumed MirrorFirm terms. A useful first step is a component-to-use map showing each asset, its proposed recipient and its delivery method. That gives the licensing discussion a concrete object and reduces the chance that a broad marketplace description outruns the permissions eventually agreed.