What should we request to inspect grounding and disclosure risk before proceeding?

Use this checklist to request a reviewable sample of generated material and an explanation of how its operational detail was constructed.

- Ask which workflow mechanisms informed the design. - Request a distinction between grounded constraints and assumptions. - Inspect generated text for unnecessary sensitive detail. - Ask how distinctive source resemblance is reviewed. - Check that example identifiers are consistently generated. - Request known limitations and unresolved review questions.

The review should focus on whether the material captures useful business mechanisms without carrying inappropriate detail into the output. A plausible handover structure may be valuable; an unusually specific personal narrative may add little evaluation value while deserving closer inspection.

Ask for an account of the transformation from operational understanding to generated cases. That account can describe rules, abstractions and review methods without delivering underlying business records. MirrorFirm's commercial output should remain generated datasets, task packs or environment material.

Treat the sample as evidence to inspect, not as proof of anonymity or compliance. The practical next step is to record which details the evaluation needs, which can be generalised and which require further explanation before the buyer accepts the proposed scope.