Which licence questions matter if we publish results or distribute benchmark tasks?

**Does permission to evaluate include permission to distribute tasks?**

Do not assume that it does. Ask whether the proposed licence covers internal evaluation, training, adaptation and redistribution separately. These are questions for the proposed agreement, not claims about terms MirrorFirm currently offers.

**What if users access tasks through our evaluation service?**

Describe what those users can see and retain. A hosted benchmark that reveals full conversations creates a different distribution pattern from a service that returns only aggregate scores. Include access through an MCP interface in that description where relevant.

**Can we publish examples with our results?**

Ask about publishing task excerpts, complete cases, policy text and derived annotations. Also clarify whether collaborators, contractors or model providers may receive the material as part of the evaluation process.

**Does generated output remove the need for review?**

No. The proposed release is generated material, but buyers should still inspect grounding and disclosure risk and clarify permitted uses. A useful first step is a concise distribution map showing who receives which artefacts and whether they can export them.