What evidence should accompany a sample before we approve broader generation?

Ask for a review pack that makes the basis and limits of the generated sample inspectable.

- Describe the operational patterns informing the design. - Distinguish grounded patterns from modelling assumptions. - Explain how generated narratives and values are constructed. - Identify checks for distinctive detail combinations. - Document unsupported branches and known simplifications. - Record reviewer findings and requested corrections. - Specify how accepted changes reach later assets.

The purpose is to assess the generated product and its construction, not to obtain the business records behind operational understanding. A useful explanation can describe a handover pattern, why it matters and how it becomes a generated case without reproducing source material.

Inspect narrative details as well as structured fields. An unusual combination of circumstances, event order and wording may deserve review even when names and identifiers are generated. Synthetic output does not guarantee anonymity, privacy compliance or regulatory approval.

MirrorFirm could provide this review material within an agreed pilot scope. Buyers should decide who assesses operational credibility, who reviews disclosure concerns and how unresolved findings affect acceptance. That creates a documented basis for proceeding rather than treating a plausible sample conversation as sufficient evidence.