Skip to content
MirrorFirm

Which failure modes should we score separately on sufficiency tasks?

Lists the distinct failure modes worth scoring on sufficiency tasks, from premature release to loops, and explains weighting and the failures that only appear in multi-step runs.

**Which failure modes should we score separately?** Score them separately, because one overall accuracy number hides which behaviour is wrong.

- **Premature release:** the case advances while required items are still missing. - **Over-request:** the request asks for an item already satisfied, by a supplied document or a held record. - **Under-request:** the request leaves a real gap unnamed, so the customer must be contacted again. - **Wrong item:** the request names a document type that would not satisfy the rule, such as a payslip where tax returns are required. - **Stale acceptance:** an expired or out-of-window document is treated as valid. - **Party mismatch:** a document issued to someone else is accepted. - **Missed escalation:** a conflict between documents is resolved by guesswork rather than referred. - **State error:** the right decision is reached but status or clock is left wrong. - **Loop:** the agent re-requests items the customer has already supplied in a later reply.

**Which matter most?** That depends on your use. A lending buyer may weigh premature release most heavily, while a service-focused buyer may care more about over-requests. Make the weights explicit in the scorer instead of burying them.

**Is there a failure that only shows in multi-step runs?** Yes. Loops and ignoring a partial reply only appear once scripted replies are part of the episode.

Separate scorers show which behaviour is wrong, and explicit weights let each buyer reflect their own tolerance for early release versus excess requests.

Audience:
Environment builders
Content type:
FAQ
Buyer question:
How to evaluate it

Content release: r-a220eb6e099b243b

More on Document sufficiency