How can a reseller make the workflow's business reasoning visible to technical buyers?

Represent the workflow as a sequence of linked events rather than a single before-and-after row. A generated release can include `request_received`, `meaning_resolved`, `dependency_identified`, `action_proposed` and `outcome_recorded` events. Each event can carry an `event_id`, `request_id`, `entity_ref` and `caused_by_event_id`.

The causal link matters more than chronological adjacency. A billing update might follow a contact change in time without being caused by it. Explicit links let a buyer inspect whether an AI system connected the correct instruction to the correct action.

A JSONL export can hold one event per line, with separate entity snapshots referenced by stable identifiers. A downstream loader can reconstruct the reasoning path for a request without interpreting every event in the release. An evaluation hook can compare proposed causal links with accepted links supplied in a restricted answer file.

For resellers, publish the event vocabulary and explain whether events represent customer statements, system actions or adjudicated outcomes. These categories should remain distinguishable when repackaged. Otherwise, a downstream customer may accidentally treat a proposed action as proof that the business completed it.