Which environment hooks make interactive evaluations reproducible?
Explicit reset, observation and scoring hooks let resellers distribute interactive tasks whose outcomes can be compared from equivalent starting conditions.
A simulated environment can expose `reset(case_id, seed)`, `observe()`, permitted mutation tools and `score(run_id)`. Reset should restore record versions, queued jobs, simulated time and notification state. Restoring only the customer table can leave later runs contaminated by actions from an earlier attempt.
Supply a manifest containing `environment_version`, `policy_version`, `case_id`, `seed` and `initial_state_digest`. Record tool calls and resulting state transitions under a run identifier. These fields let a downstream buyer reproduce the starting conditions and trace a failed outcome.
Keep scoring assertions outside the agent's observation surface. The agent may need a policy document to decide what to do, but it should not receive the hidden expected action sequence. Score valid final states and required constraints without rejecting an alternative permitted sequence merely because it differs from a reference trace.
For resellers, document which behaviours are deterministic and which depend on seeded events. Include a reset verification check that compares the restored state with the declared initial state. This makes environment packaging part of evaluation quality rather than an undocumented responsibility passed to each downstream customer.
Define a reproducible execution contract so downstream buyers can distinguish agent behaviour from environment variation.
- Audience:
- Licensed resellers
- Content type:
- Integration
- Buyer question:
- How to evaluate it
Content release: r-a220eb6e099b243b
Related questions
- How can a scenario test whether an agent handles another worker's concurrent change?
- How can buyers check whether an agent understands changes rather than memorising wording?
- What should buyers inspect before trusting a generated change evaluation set?
- Which evaluation hooks expose retry and duplicate-processing failures?
- How should evaluation distinguish complete handling from a correct-looking final record?
- How can buyers evaluate correctness without requiring one exact action sequence?