How can buyers inspect generated realism and disclosure risk?

**What does grounding mean for quality inspection?**

MirrorFirm's positioning is that generated output is informed by direct observation of business operations. A buyer can ask how that grounding informs workflow structure, decision points, handovers and exceptions in a proposed release. The commercial output remains generated material, never real business records.

**What evidence should reviewers request?**

Ask for a description of the generation inputs and transformation boundaries, together with a rationale connecting task mechanics to business processes. Reviewers can then inspect whether the generated policies and records support believable decisions without requiring access to underlying business records.

**Does generation settle disclosure concerns?**

No. Grounding and disclosure risk should be inspected. Review can consider distinctive phrases, unusual combinations of details and any resemblance that warrants investigation. It should also establish how flagged content is handled before acceptance.

For evaluation teams, this review sits alongside task validity. A coherent dependency graph does not answer questions about source handling, and a source review does not establish that the benchmark measures useful behaviour. Request evidence for both, with limitations stated explicitly.