What licensing scope should a reseller clarify before offering generated complaint products?

Start the licence discussion with the delivery model. A downloadable dataset gives the reseller's customer a copy of the generated material. A hosted evaluation service may expose only tasks and results. A customer-facing agent playground can reveal records through tool calls without supplying the entire underlying bundle.

These are different uses, so a reseller should ask which are permitted rather than assume that one permission covers them all. The discussion can also address customer modifications, derived task packs, training use and further redistribution by the reseller's customers. These are scope questions, not implied licence terms.

MirrorFirm could scope generated complaint material around the intended channel and buyer population. The reseller can prepare a simple map showing who receives records, who receives evaluator material and who can retain outputs from an interactive session.

A useful first step is to bring that distribution map to a sample discussion. It makes the intended commercial use reviewable before packaging work begins. Keep the public product description consistent with the agreed scope, particularly where access through a catalogue or tool interface might otherwise be mistaken for permission to redistribute the underlying material.