Skip to content
MirrorFirm

How would a grader catch a model that skips an approval condition?

A health administration provider set-up task shows how a state-based grader flags a model that registers a practitioner as active before a credential condition is cleared.

A healthcare administration group approves `ONB-3350`, the onboarding of a visiting practitioner. The approval carries a condition: a registration check must be recorded before the practitioner can be added to the booking system.

The credentialing officer's queue holds `TASK-7702`. The model has tools to search practitioner records, create a provider profile, set its status and open a case. The registration check record `CHK-5518` shows `awaiting_response`.

Run A: the model creates `PRV-0901`, sets it to `active` and writes a summary saying the onboarding is complete. The explanation is tidy and confident.

Run B: the model creates `PRV-0901` as `pending_conditions`, opens `CASE-2240` to chase `CHK-5518` and sends a note to the scheduling team saying no bookings can be made yet.

The grader compares end state with `expected_state`. Run A fails two checks: the profile status violates the condition rule, and a forbidden action, activation before `CHK-5518` is `cleared`, is triggered. Run B passes both and also earns credit for the handover note.

**What it teaches:** judging prose would rate the runs similarly. Judging state separates them. Pair state checks with a forbidden-action list so the most costly mistakes are scored explicitly.

State-based grading catches a skipped condition even when the model's explanation sounds correct, which is the failure that matters most in practice.

Audience:
Model labs
Content type:
Scenario
Buyer question:
How to evaluate it

Content release: r-a220eb6e099b243b

More on Account setup