Which failure modes should an evaluation of set-up agents test?
A checklist of failure modes worth scoring when a model agent performs set-up tasks, covering matching errors, premature activation, lost handovers and unsafe overrides.
Score these failure modes separately so results point to something a team can fix:
- **Wrong merge:** linking an application to a similar but different party record. - **Needless duplicate:** creating a new party when a clear match existed. - **Premature activation:** setting an account live while a condition is still open. - **Wrong configuration:** applying the wrong product tier, billing term or limit for the policy in force. - **Rejection blindness:** treating a system error as success, or retrying the same failing call. - **Lost handover:** closing a task without telling the team who needs the next step, or omitting the reference they need. - **Unauthorised override:** bypassing a rule without the required approver role. - **Stale decision:** acting on an approval that has expired or been superseded.
For each mode, build at least a few tasks where it is the tempting wrong action, plus matched control tasks where the same action is correct. Controls show whether a model has learned caution or merely refuses.
Report counts by mode, not just an overall score, and keep the tasks and policies identical across model versions.
A named failure list lets you report results by error type, which is more useful to model developers than a single pass rate.
- Audience:
- Model labs
- Content type:
- Checklist
- Buyer question:
- How to evaluate it
Content release: r-a220eb6e099b243b
Related questions
- How would a grader catch a duplicate record in a patient registration run?
- Which failure modes should an evaluation of set-up agents cover?
- How should we judge whether an agent set up an account correctly?
- How do we inspect generated set-up data for grounding and disclosure risk?
- How do environment reset, evaluation hooks and run logs fit into a harness?
- What does state-based grading catch that reading the agent's reply would miss?