How do I know whether set-up belongs in my environment?
A short checklist of signs that a record-creation workflow would improve your simulated environment, from grading on replies to needing delayed consequences and role handovers.
Use these signs to decide whether set-up is the right workflow to build into your environment next.
- Your agents create or update records today, but you grade them on replies rather than on state changes. - You need tasks where one approval fans out into several linked records across more than one system. - You want ambiguity to matter, such as near-matching parties or conditions buried in free-text notes. - You need correct behaviour that includes stopping, referring or leaving a record in a pending status. - You want delayed consequences, like a wrong first invoice, to expose earlier mistakes in the same episode. - Your harness already supports reset and snapshot, or you can add both without large changes. - You have roles that hand work to each other, so context carried in notes and queues matters. - You can describe the end state of a good run in terms of specific records, values and links.
If your agents write records but you grade their replies, this workflow gives you a direct way to grade what they actually changed.
- Audience:
- Environment builders
- Content type:
- Checklist
- Buyer question:
- What it is and why it matters
Content release: r-a220eb6e099b243b
Related questions
- What is account set-up, and why does it matter for training and evaluating agents?
- What does a set-up decision look like when an applicant already exists in the system?
- Which signs show a set-up workflow is worth using for agent training or evaluation?
- Which upstream and downstream records does an agent link together during set-up?
- Why is account set-up harder for an agent than a single create call?
- How does set-up map onto an environment's entities, states and tool actions?